You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Indirect Reciprocity under Incomplete Observation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Naoki Masuda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 16% |
| Psychology | 10 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 24% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,388,118
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,006
of 8,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,679
of 130,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#32
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.