↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Avian Intrathoracic Air Sacs in a New Predatory Dinosaur from Argentina

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
60 Wikipedia pages
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for Avian Intrathoracic Air Sacs in a New Predatory Dinosaur from Argentina
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003303
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul C. Sereno, Ricardo N. Martinez, Jeffrey A. Wilson, David J. Varricchio, Oscar A. Alcober, Hans C. E. Larsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Argentina 4 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 190 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Student > Master 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 23 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 41%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 70 33%
Environmental Science 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 28 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#559,506
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,672
of 220,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,059
of 97,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#21
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.