You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Genomics and Disorder Prediction Identify Biologically Relevant SH3 Protein Interactions
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2005
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010026 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pedro Beltrao, Luis Serrano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 36 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 34% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 32% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 3 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 59% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 20% |
Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,047,952
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,696
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,028
of 68,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.