You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carol Tenopir, Suzie Allard, Kimberly Douglass, Arsev Umur Aydinoglu, Lei Wu, Eleanor Read, Maribeth Manoff, Mike Frame |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 9% |
| Canada | 6 | 4% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 68% |
| Scientists | 24 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 61 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 2% |
| Spain | 11 | <1% |
| Canada | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 44 | 4% |
| Unknown | 961 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 215 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 168 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 153 | 13% |
| Librarian | 148 | 13% |
| Other | 79 | 7% |
| Other | 243 | 21% |
| Unknown | 131 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 221 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 221 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 164 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 54 | 5% |
| Engineering | 44 | 4% |
| Other | 263 | 23% |
| Unknown | 170 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 263. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#141,361
of 25,826,146 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,179
of 225,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#431
of 128,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#14
of 2,102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,826,146 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.