You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional Tooth Regeneration Using a Bioengineered Tooth Unit as a Mature Organ Replacement Regenerative Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021531 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masamitsu Oshima, Mitsumasa Mizuno, Aya Imamura, Miho Ogawa, Masato Yasukawa, Hiromichi Yamazaki, Ritsuko Morita, Etsuko Ikeda, Kazuhisa Nakao, Teruko Takano-Yamamoto, Shohei Kasugai, Masahiro Saito, Takashi Tsuji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 20% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 56 | 23% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 8% |
| Engineering | 18 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#661,764
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,848
of 224,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,385
of 128,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#95
of 2,171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.