You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chimpanzees Share Forbidden Fruit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberley J. Hockings, Tatyana Humle, James R. Anderson, Dora Biro, Claudia Sousa, Gaku Ohashi, Tetsuro Matsuzawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 97 | 46% |
| Psychology | 31 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#436,930
of 23,402,852 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,277
of 200,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#597
of 70,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#8
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,402,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.