You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa2102214 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shabir A Madhi, Vicky Baillie, Clare L Cutland, Merryn Voysey, Anthonet L Koen, Lee Fairlie, Sherman D Padayachee, Keertan Dheda, Shaun L Barnabas, Qasim E Bhorat, Carmen Briner, Gaurav Kwatra, Khatija Ahmed, Parvinder Aley, Sutika Bhikha, Jinal N Bhiman, As'ad E Bhorat, Jeanine du Plessis, Aliasgar Esmail, Marisa Groenewald, Elizea Horne, Shi-Hsia Hwa, Aylin Jose, Teresa Lambe, Matt Laubscher, Mookho Malahleha, Masebole Masenya, Mduduzi Masilela, Shakeel McKenzie, Kgaogelo Molapo, Andrew Moultrie, Suzette Oelofse, Faeezah Patel, Sureshnee Pillay, Sarah Rhead, Hylton Rodel, Lindie Rossouw, Carol Taoushanis, Houriiyah Tegally, Asha Thombrayil, Samuel van Eck, Constantinos K Wibmer, Nicholas M Durham, Elizabeth J Kelly, Tonya L Villafana, Sarah Gilbert, Andrew J Pollard, Tulio de Oliveira, Penny L Moore, Alex Sigal, Alane Izu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13,383 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 757 | 6% |
| United States | 520 | 4% |
| Thailand | 507 | 4% |
| Germany | 378 | 3% |
| France | 362 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 353 | 3% |
| Spain | 244 | 2% |
| Canada | 222 | 2% |
| India | 138 | 1% |
| Other | 1455 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8447 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12504 | 93% |
| Scientists | 473 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 288 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 112 | <1% |
| Unknown | 6 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1277 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 148 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 129 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 127 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 103 | 8% |
| Other | 81 | 6% |
| Other | 224 | 18% |
| Unknown | 465 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 251 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 129 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 81 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 48 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 4% |
| Other | 204 | 16% |
| Unknown | 517 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7657. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2024.
All research outputs
#348
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#39
of 32,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27
of 457,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#3
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.