You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tracking the Unconscious Generation of Free Decisions Using UItra-High Field fMRI
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021612 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Bode, Anna Hanxi He, Chun Siong Soon, Robert Trampel, Robert Turner, John-Dylan Haynes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 35 | 80% |
| Scientists | 7 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Italy | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 279 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 19% |
| Researcher | 55 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 12% |
| Professor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 104 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 47 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 15% |
| Unknown | 46 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#376,553
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,314
of 225,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,333
of 129,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#51
of 2,085 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,085 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.