↓ Skip to main content

Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
8 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
15 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul J. Roebber, David M. Schultz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 7%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 94 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Professor 12 11%
Other 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 19%
Social Sciences 19 17%
Computer Science 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 33 29%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,185,664
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,058
of 222,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,549
of 120,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#96
of 1,518 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,518 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.