You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prospective Genomic Characterization of the German Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O104:H4 Outbreak by Rapid Next Generation Sequencing Technology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022751 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Mellmann, Dag Harmsen, Craig A. Cummings, Emily B. Zentz, Shana R. Leopold, Alain Rico, Karola Prior, Rafael Szczepanowski, Yongmei Ji, Wenlan Zhang, Stephen F. McLaughlin, John K. Henkhaus, Benjamin Leopold, Martina Bielaszewska, Rita Prager, Pius M. Brzoska, Richard L. Moore, Simone Guenther, Jonathan M. Rothberg, Helge Karch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Sweden | 3 | 8% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Central African Republic | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 57% |
| Scientists | 12 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 692 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 1% |
| Sweden | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 630 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 150 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 87 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 123 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 308 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 100 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 52 | 8% |
| Engineering | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 8% |
| Unknown | 111 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#441,748
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,172
of 223,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,560
of 130,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#61
of 2,250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.