↓ Skip to main content

On the Size and Flight Diversity of Giant Pterosaurs, the Use of Birds as Pterosaur Analogues and Comments on Pterosaur Flightlessness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Size and Flight Diversity of Giant Pterosaurs, the Use of Birds as Pterosaur Analogues and Comments on Pterosaur Flightlessness
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013982
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark P. Witton, Michael B. Habib

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Sweden 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 176 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 20%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 17%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 51 26%
Engineering 17 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Environmental Science 9 5%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 28 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#124,099
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,921
of 224,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310
of 110,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#12
of 1,036 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,036 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.