↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007092.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josip Car, Britta Lang, Anthea Colledge, Chuin Ung, Azeem Majeed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 2%
United States 7 2%
Canada 3 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 390 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 17%
Student > Master 65 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 7%
Student > Bachelor 28 7%
Other 100 24%
Unknown 66 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 32%
Social Sciences 54 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 11%
Psychology 32 8%
Computer Science 14 3%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 91 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,469,489
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,689
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,740
of 197,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.