↓ Skip to main content

Swearing, Euphemisms, and Linguistic Relativity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Swearing, Euphemisms, and Linguistic Relativity
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey S. Bowers, Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 20%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 59 36%
Psychology 34 21%
Arts and Humanities 10 6%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 32 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#613,474
of 25,692,343 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,300
of 223,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,224
of 130,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#86
of 2,257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,692,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.