You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Religious Factors and Hippocampal Atrophy in Late Life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy D. Owen, R. David Hayward, Harold G. Koenig, David C. Steffens, Martha E. Payne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 175 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 35 | 20% |
| United States | 27 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 7% |
| Chile | 6 | 3% |
| Russia | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 67 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 158 | 90% |
| Scientists | 9 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 24% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 28% |
| Unknown | 24 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#125,463
of 25,907,102 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,942
of 225,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347
of 121,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#8
of 1,478 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,907,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,478 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.