You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Quality of Reporting on the Vegetative State in Italian Newspapers. The Case of Eluana Englaro
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018706 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicola Latronico, Ottavia Manenti, Luca Baini, Frank A. Rasulo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Student > Master | 3 | 15% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Psychology | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2011.
All research outputs
#5,865,725
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,398
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,283
of 110,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#576
of 1,496 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,496 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.