You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geographic Constraints on Social Network Groups
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016939 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jukka-Pekka Onnela, Samuel Arbesman, Marta C. González, Albert-László Barabási, Nicholas A. Christakis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 33% |
Australia | 2 | 17% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 29 | 6% |
Italy | 6 | 1% |
Brazil | 6 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
France | 4 | <1% |
Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
Mexico | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 4 | <1% |
Spain | 3 | <1% |
Other | 19 | 4% |
Unknown | 410 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 141 | 29% |
Researcher | 98 | 20% |
Student > Master | 66 | 13% |
Professor | 27 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 5% |
Other | 93 | 19% |
Unknown | 46 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 109 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 55 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 41 | 8% |
Engineering | 33 | 7% |
Other | 144 | 29% |
Unknown | 66 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,098,295
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,233
of 215,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,033
of 113,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#90
of 1,474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.