↓ Skip to main content

Improving abundance estimates from electrofishing removal sampling

Overview of attention for article published in Fisheries Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving abundance estimates from electrofishing removal sampling
Published in
Fisheries Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.09.015
Authors

Richard D. Hedger, Elvira de Eyto, Mary Dillane, Ola H. Diserud, Kjetil Hindar, Philip McGinnity, Russell Poole, Ger Rogan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 9 12%
Other 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 41%
Environmental Science 21 28%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#14,737,203
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Research
#2,029
of 2,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,199
of 280,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Research
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.