You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018657 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heather A. Piwowar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 67 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
Ireland | 3 | 4% |
France | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Costa Rica | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 50 | 75% |
Scientists | 12 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 31 | 10% |
Spain | 7 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
Germany | 4 | 1% |
Australia | 4 | 1% |
Canada | 3 | <1% |
Sweden | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Other | 16 | 5% |
Unknown | 243 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 72 | 22% |
Librarian | 52 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 14% |
Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
Other | 26 | 8% |
Other | 70 | 21% |
Unknown | 28 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 78 | 24% |
Computer Science | 67 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 57 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 12 | 4% |
Other | 51 | 16% |
Unknown | 39 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 130. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#327,284
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,642
of 225,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,091
of 129,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#37
of 2,171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.