↓ Skip to main content

The Manipulative Complexity of Lower Paleolithic Stone Toolmaking

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Manipulative Complexity of Lower Paleolithic Stone Toolmaking
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013718
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aldo Faisal, Dietrich Stout, Jan Apel, Bruce Bradley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 164 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 21%
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 38 21%
Social Sciences 28 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 10%
Psychology 13 7%
Neuroscience 8 4%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#747,180
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#10,326
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,223
of 101,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#59
of 982 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 982 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.