You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-s1-s11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Ferreira Maia, Sarah J Moore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 20% |
| Canada | 3 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,010 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 990 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 171 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 135 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 13% |
| Researcher | 123 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 50 | 5% |
| Other | 154 | 15% |
| Unknown | 249 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 284 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 91 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 65 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 198 | 20% |
| Unknown | 271 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 364. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#88,763
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4
of 5,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239
of 119,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.