You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Use of Twitter to Track Levels of Disease Activity and Public Concern in the U.S. during the Influenza A H1N1 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019467 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessio Signorini, Alberto Maria Segre, Philip M. Polgreen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 23% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Kenya | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 75% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 906 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Portugal | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 2% |
| Unknown | 826 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 192 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 148 | 16% |
| Researcher | 130 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 5% |
| Other | 184 | 20% |
| Unknown | 143 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 229 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 100 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 96 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 6% |
| Engineering | 44 | 5% |
| Other | 198 | 22% |
| Unknown | 188 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#258,794
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,734
of 226,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#831
of 124,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#19
of 1,606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.