You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does Masculinity Matter? The Contribution of Masculine Face Shape to Male Attractiveness in Humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013585 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Isabel M. L. Scott, Nicholas Pound, Ian D. Stephen, Andrew P. Clark, Ian S. Penton-Voak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 87 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#651,532
of 25,202,494 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,809
of 218,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,749
of 105,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#41
of 961 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,202,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 961 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.