↓ Skip to main content

Replicative Senescence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Continuous and Organized Process

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
28 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
935 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
634 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replicative Senescence of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Continuous and Organized Process
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Wagner, Patrick Horn, Mirco Castoldi, Anke Diehlmann, Simone Bork, Rainer Saffrich, Vladimir Benes, Jonathon Blake, Stefan Pfister, Volker Eckstein, Anthony D. Ho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 634 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 615 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 146 23%
Researcher 111 18%
Student > Master 77 12%
Student > Bachelor 74 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 6%
Other 99 16%
Unknown 90 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 221 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 121 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 80 13%
Engineering 36 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 2%
Other 63 10%
Unknown 101 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,517,281
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,574
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,097
of 98,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#76
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.