You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dissection of Kinesin's Processivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004612 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Adio, Johann Jaud, Bettina Ebbing, Matthias Rief, Günther Woehlke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 43 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Researcher | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,826,890
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#67,984
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,331
of 95,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#196
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.