You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ontogenetic De Novo Copy Number Variations (CNVs) as a Source of Genetic Individuality: Studies on Two Families with MZD Twins for Schizophrenia
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017125 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sujit Maiti, Kiran Halagur Bhoge Gowda Kumar, Christina A. Castellani, Richard O'Reilly, Shiva M. Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
India | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 91 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 29 | 29% |
Unknown | 3 | 3% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 46% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 19% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 13% |
Psychology | 9 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,324,458
of 25,196,456 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,746
of 218,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,893
of 114,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#121
of 1,411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,196,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.