You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Thinking about Not-Thinking”: Neural Correlates of Conceptual Processing during Zen Meditation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003083 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe Pagnoni, Milos Cekic, Ying Guo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 18% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Turkey | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 3% |
| Unknown | 429 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 99 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 60 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 118 | 24% |
| Unknown | 46 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 161 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 50 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 89 | 18% |
| Unknown | 68 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2022.
All research outputs
#710,434
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,530
of 218,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,391
of 94,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#20
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.