↓ Skip to main content

Conservation Genetics of a Critically Endangered Limpet Genus and Rediscovery of an Extinct Species

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservation Genetics of a Critically Endangered Limpet Genus and Rediscovery of an Extinct Species
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diarmaid Ó Foighil, Jingchun Li, Taehwan Lee, Paul Johnson, Ryan Evans, John B. Burch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 22%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 70%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,313,847
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#29,375
of 198,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,721
of 112,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#264
of 1,723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.