You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mobile Phone Based Clinical Microscopy for Global Health Applications
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0006320 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David N. Breslauer, Robi N. Maamari, Neil A. Switz, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 18% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
Indonesia | 1 | 9% |
Poland | 1 | 9% |
Ireland | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 4 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 767 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 1% |
Switzerland | 6 | <1% |
South Africa | 4 | <1% |
India | 4 | <1% |
Australia | 4 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
Other | 12 | 2% |
Unknown | 716 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 154 | 20% |
Researcher | 132 | 17% |
Student > Master | 82 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 76 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 5% |
Other | 162 | 21% |
Unknown | 122 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 158 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 11% |
Computer Science | 55 | 7% |
Physics and Astronomy | 38 | 5% |
Other | 182 | 24% |
Unknown | 152 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#494,553
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,911
of 213,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,135
of 116,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#17
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.