Title |
Pathology Image-Sharing on Social Media: Recommendations for Protecting Privacy While Motivating Education
|
---|---|
Published in |
The AMA Journal of Ethic, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.stas1-1608 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Genevieve M Crane, Jerad M Gardner |
Abstract |
There is a rising interest in the use of social media by pathologists. However, the use of pathology images on social media has been debated, particularly gross examination, autopsy, and dermatologic condition photographs. The immediacy of the interactions, increased interest from patients and patient groups, and fewer barriers to public discussion raise additional considerations to ensure patient privacy is protected. Yet these very features all add to the power of social media for educating other physicians and the nonmedical public about disease and for creating better understanding of the important role of pathologists in patient care. The professional and societal benefits are overwhelmingly positive, and we believe the potential for harm is minimal provided common sense and routine patient privacy principles are utilized. We lay out ethical and practical guidelines for pathologists who use social media professionally. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 147 | 26% |
India | 18 | 3% |
Spain | 16 | 3% |
Canada | 13 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 2% |
Saudi Arabia | 8 | 1% |
Brazil | 6 | 1% |
Mexico | 6 | 1% |
Germany | 4 | <1% |
Other | 49 | 9% |
Unknown | 288 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 346 | 61% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 105 | 19% |
Scientists | 90 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 16 | 3% |
Unknown | 7 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 32% |
Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 40% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Linguistics | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |