You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can Playing the Computer Game “Tetris” Reduce the Build-Up of Flashbacks for Trauma? A Proposal from Cognitive Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emily A. Holmes, Ella L. James, Thomas Coode-Bate, Catherine Deeprose |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 9% |
| Australia | 9 | 5% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 95 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 6% |
| Scientists | 7 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 564 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 516 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 90 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 14% |
| Researcher | 67 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
| Other | 114 | 20% |
| Unknown | 93 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 271 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 30 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 11% |
| Unknown | 118 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 437. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#66,614
of 25,944,331 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,117
of 226,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 186,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,944,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.