You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diabetes and the Risk of Multi-System Aging Phenotypes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004144 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Feng-Ping Lu, Kun-Pei Lin, Hsu-Ko Kuo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 359 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 16% |
| Researcher | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 7% |
| Psychology | 26 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 19% |
| Unknown | 86 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,316,719
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,508
of 225,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,948
of 189,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#46
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.