You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT) — Improving Hand-Hygiene Compliance in UK Healthcare Workers: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0041617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher Fuller, Susan Michie, Joanne Savage, John McAteer, Sarah Besser, Andre Charlett, Andrew Hayward, Barry D. Cookson, Ben S. Cooper, Georgia Duckworth, Annette Jeanes, Jenny Roberts, Louise Teare, Sheldon Stone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Malawi | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 269 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 68 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 13% |
| Psychology | 24 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,664,115
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#47,761
of 224,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,717
of 202,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#786
of 4,831 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,831 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.