↓ Skip to main content

Mistletoe therapy in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mistletoe therapy in oncology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003297.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Horneber, Gerd van Ackeren, Klaus Linde, Matthias Rostock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 264 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 19%
Researcher 43 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 45 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 10%
Psychology 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 56 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#242,952
of 17,408,409 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#502
of 11,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,097
of 204,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,408,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.