You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Analyses of Fundamental Differences in Membrane Transport Capabilities in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2005
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010027 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qinghu Ren, Ian T Paulsen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 4% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 141 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 26% |
Researcher | 29 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 18% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 6% |
Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 17 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,866,366
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#2,589
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,155
of 69,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.