You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Carnivory in the Teasel Dipsacus fullonum — The Effect of Experimental Feeding on Growth and Seed Set
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017935 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter J. A. Shaw, Kyle Shackleton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 18 | 44% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Isle of Man | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 76% |
| Scientists | 9 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 28% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#669,744
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,035
of 217,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,451
of 125,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#53
of 1,433 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,433 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.