You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of Biodiversity Surrogates for Conservation Planning: Different Measures of Effectiveness Generate a Kaleidoscope of Variation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011430 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hedley S. Grantham, Robert L. Pressey, Jessie A. Wells, Andrew J. Beattie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Finland | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 284 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 22% |
| Researcher | 64 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 108 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 60 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2010.
All research outputs
#2,609,014
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,650
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,125
of 96,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#154
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.