You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Factors Affecting the Introduction of New Vaccines to Poor Nations: A Comparative Study of the Haemophilus influenzae Type B and Hepatitis B Vaccines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013802 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aharona Glatman-Freedman, Mary-Louise Cohen, Katherine A. Nichols, Robert F. Porges, Ivy Rayos Saludes, Kevin Steffens, Victor G. Rodwin, David W. Britt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,753,488
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#35,077
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,471
of 101,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#216
of 982 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 982 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.