You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microstructure Abnormalities in Adolescents with Internet Addiction Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0020708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Yuan, Wei Qin, Guihong Wang, Fang Zeng, Liyan Zhao, Xuejuan Yang, Peng Liu, Jixin Liu, Jinbo Sun, Karen M. von Deneen, Qiyong Gong, Yijun Liu, Jie Tian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Sweden | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 72% |
| Scientists | 15 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 334 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 58 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Researcher | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 22% |
| Unknown | 61 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 102 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 18% |
| Unknown | 72 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 219. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#180,504
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,684
of 225,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#537
of 124,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#14
of 1,762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.