You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From Bad to Good: Fitness Reversals and the Ascent of Deleterious Mutations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew C Cowperthwaite, J. J Bull, Lauren Ancel Meyers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 25% |
| Professor | 9 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#914,578
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#690
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,412
of 84,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.