↓ Skip to main content

Acoel Flatworms Are Not Platyhelminthes: Evidence from Phylogenomics

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acoel Flatworms Are Not Platyhelminthes: Evidence from Phylogenomics
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000717
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hervé Philippe, Henner Brinkmann, Pedro Martinez, Marta Riutort, Jaume Baguñà

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 4%
Brazil 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Indonesia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 131 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 16%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Professor 13 8%
Other 39 25%
Unknown 7 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 11 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,078,385
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,338
of 196,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,391
of 67,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#40
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.