You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Generation of Germline-Competent Rat Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sanae Hamanaka, Tomoyuki Yamaguchi, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Megumi Kato-Itoh, Satoshi Yamazaki, Hideyuki Sato, Ayumi Umino, Yukiko Wakiyama, Mami Arai, Makoto Sanbo, Masumi Hirabayashi, Hiromitsu Nakauchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 24% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 24% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,582,947
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,088
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,114
of 118,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#792
of 2,171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.