You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sharing Data for Public Health Research by Members of an International Online Diabetes Social Network
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019256 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elissa R. Weitzman, Ben Adida, Skyler Kelemen, Kenneth D. Mandl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 56% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 23% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 31 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Psychology | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,159,156
of 25,247,212 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#26,592
of 219,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,050
of 116,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#210
of 1,519 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,519 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.