You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Spider Silk Constructs Enhance Axonal Regeneration and Remyelination in Long Nerve Defects in Sheep
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016990 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Radtke, Christina Allmeling, Karl-Heinz Waldmann, Kerstin Reimers, Kerstin Thies, Henning C. Schenk, Anja Hillmer, Merlin Guggenheim, Gudrun Brandes, Peter M. Vogt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 15% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2023.
All research outputs
#332,513
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,733
of 222,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,032
of 117,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#30
of 1,373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.