You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An Objective Scatter Index Based on Double-Pass Retinal Images of a Point Source to Classify Cataracts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Artal, Antonio Benito, Guillermo M. Pérez, Encarna Alcón, Álvaro De Casas, Jaume Pujol, José M. Marín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Argentina | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,579,012
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#19,463
of 224,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,099
of 196,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#131
of 1,278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.