You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the Potential Efficacy of Invasive Lionfish (Pterois volitans) Removals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019666 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew B. Barbour, Michael S. Allen, Thomas K. Frazer, Krista D. Sherman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Belize | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 346 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 71 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 14% |
| Researcher | 48 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 56 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 194 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 65 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,010,655
of 23,289,753 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,570
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,906
of 111,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#108
of 1,646 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,289,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,646 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.