↓ Skip to main content

Relaxation of Selective Constraints Causes Independent Selenoprotein Extinction in Insect Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relaxation of Selective Constraints Causes Independent Selenoprotein Extinction in Insect Genomes
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0002968
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles E. Chapple, Roderic Guigó

Abstract

Selenoproteins are a diverse family of proteins notable for the presence of the 21st amino acid, selenocysteine. Until very recently, all metazoan genomes investigated encoded selenoproteins, and these proteins had therefore been believed to be essential for animal life. Challenging this assumption, recent comparative analyses of insect genomes have revealed that some insect genomes appear to have lost selenoprotein genes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
France 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
India 1 2%
Moldova, Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 44 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 28%
Researcher 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Mathematics 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2012.
All research outputs
#12,863,576
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#100,139
of 193,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,330
of 82,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#369
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.