↓ Skip to main content

Earliest Directly-Dated Human Skull-Cups

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
54 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
26 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Earliest Directly-Dated Human Skull-Cups
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Silvia M. Bello, Simon A. Parfitt, Chris B. Stringer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Denmark 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 131 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 19 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 46 33%
Social Sciences 25 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 20 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 240. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#160,991
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,405
of 226,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#470
of 119,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#15
of 1,324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.