You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules for Selecting a Postdoctoral Position
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philip E Bourne, Iddo Friedberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 52% |
| Scientists | 15 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 669 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 39 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 2% |
| Germany | 10 | 1% |
| Brazil | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 8 | 1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Hungary | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Unknown | 534 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 190 | 28% |
| Researcher | 183 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 45 | 7% |
| Professor | 32 | 5% |
| Other | 110 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 289 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 49 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 6% |
| Engineering | 30 | 4% |
| Psychology | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 162 | 24% |
| Unknown | 76 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#468,465
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#326
of 9,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#931
of 169,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.