You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten Simple Rules for Doing Your Best Research, According to Hamming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030213 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas C Erren, Paul Cullen, Michael Erren, Philip E Bourne |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 362 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 38 | 10% |
| Colombia | 31 | 9% |
| United States | 20 | 6% |
| Spain | 15 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 13 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 3% |
| Peru | 8 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 7 | 2% |
| Chile | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 63 | 17% |
| Unknown | 149 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 293 | 81% |
| Scientists | 48 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,736 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 87 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | <1% |
| Germany | 20 | <1% |
| Brazil | 18 | <1% |
| Canada | 13 | <1% |
| India | 12 | <1% |
| Spain | 10 | <1% |
| France | 9 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 8 | <1% |
| Other | 102 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4430 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 965 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 921 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 437 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 336 | 7% |
| Professor | 336 | 7% |
| Other | 998 | 21% |
| Unknown | 743 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 672 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 553 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 390 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 316 | 7% |
| Engineering | 271 | 6% |
| Other | 1663 | 35% |
| Unknown | 871 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 314. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#111,174
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#78
of 9,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128
of 90,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.