↓ Skip to main content

A Brain-Computer Interface Based Attention Training Program for Treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Brain-Computer Interface Based Attention Training Program for Treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0046692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Choon Guan Lim, Tih Shih Lee, Cuntai Guan, Daniel Shuen Sheng Fung, Yudong Zhao, Stephanie Sze Wei Teng, Haihong Zhang, K. Ranga Rama Krishnan

Abstract

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms can be difficult to treat. We previously reported that a 20-session brain-computer interface (BCI) attention training programme improved ADHD symptoms. Here, we investigated a new more intensive BCI-based attention training game system on 20 unmedicated ADHD children (16 males, 4 females) with significant inattentive symptoms (combined and inattentive ADHD subtypes). This new system monitored attention through a head band with dry EEG sensors, which was used to drive a feed forward game. The system was calibrated for each user by measuring the EEG parameters during a Stroop task. Treatment consisted of an 8-week training comprising 24 sessions followed by 3 once-monthly booster training sessions. Following intervention, both parent-rated inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms on the ADHD Rating Scale showed significant improvement. At week 8, the mean improvement was -4.6 (5.9) and -4.7 (5.6) respectively for inattentive symptoms and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms (both p<0.01). Cohen's d effect size for inattentive symptoms was large at 0.78 at week 8 and 0.84 at week 24 (post-boosters). Further analysis showed that the change in the EEG based BCI ADHD severity measure correlated with the change ADHD Rating Scale scores. The BCI-based attention training game system is a potential new treatment for ADHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 351 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 19%
Student > Master 67 18%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 40 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 4%
Other 47 13%
Unknown 77 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 19%
Engineering 47 13%
Computer Science 42 12%
Neuroscience 27 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 6%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 87 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,129,461
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#14,389
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,683
of 202,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#242
of 4,844 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,844 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.